Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 October 25

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

25 October 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-10-25 Edit

2010-10-25 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed recreation of a since-redirected article. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Translation from de.wiki, tagged source is machine translation of same. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Fairly short factual sentences regardless. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. No creativity. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Attributed split. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:57, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Keeping an eye on to make sure it doesn't come back. Will rev delete if necessary, but would prefer not since there's many hundreds of edits twixt here and its introduction in October 2007. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:11, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:18, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Excised, pending some verification of authorization. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Seems to be, though I don't generally evaluate these as carefully as I would a CCI. When the content is authored by somebody else and I don't see copying from the problematic article, I presume its clear. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Yes, unusably close with clear following of structure and fragmented literal similarity in language. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: There is some conversation regarding this article on my talk page. Investigating. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • While there's an assertion that the linkedin page was copied from Wikipedia, there was a substantial change in the article here which changed it to almost directly match the linkedin article, and it has since evolved slightly away from the linkedin article, so I believe rolling it back to the version prior to that change is the safest course of action. A temp page rewrite was also created which contained most of the same text as the blanked article. VernoWhitney (talk) 13:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. If Mr. Howerton chooses to tell Wikipedia that he copied the content from us, we can restore it. Absent direct verification of that, we can't conclude reverse infringement, particularly given the dramatic introduction of the text in question. Earlier version restored. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS pending but not yet verified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The first edit to the article changed it further away from the source, which makes reverse infringement unlikely. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Everything including SCV is finished except this
  • I've asked another admin to review the rewrite. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Done MLauba (Talk) 13:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2010_October_25&oldid=1077828282"