Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 February 23

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

23 February 2010

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-02-23 Edit

2010-02-23 (Suspected copyright violations)
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. MLauba (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirected. MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Split, attributed. MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Inomyabcs (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Could not find material in website that would result in copyright violation. Inomyabcs (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article redirected to non-infringing article. Inomyabcs (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed, but please check creator's contributions. MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a copyvio. MER-C 04:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a copyvio. MER-C 04:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS pending, blanked MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Public domain. MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a copyvio. MER-C 04:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Removed. MER-C 08:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Inomyabcs (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Material hidden on article. Reworded information. References not valid for the information covered. Inomyabcs (talk) 17:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --MLauba (talk) 16:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
completed
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just to be sure, I checked the PD DNB, since the subject is old enough, but did not find this article at [1]. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:24, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Have compared the PD DNB and the ODNB, and the remaining text is clear. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verified significant differences from PD DNB. Deleted to allow new creation of clean. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Verified significant differences from PD DNB. Deleted to allow new creation of clean. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY Relisting. Contributor attempted to simply excise the material, but it extended beyond the identified boundaries and is extensive enough that the entire article needs to be rewritten to avoid creating an unauthorized derivative. I have blanked the entire article and explained at talk page. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting. Contributor removed copyvio template out of process. Have explained to him the need to replace the article with a new one that is not an unauthorized derivative. Note he indicates the lead paragraph is his original authorship, which may be true, but in a CCI we need to verify. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]