Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2005 September 22

• Granada Plus (history · last edit) from [1]. (Source is licensed under CC Attribution-NoDerivs 1.0 licence) Marknew 15:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure that this constitutes a copyvio. Certainly that page looks to have been a source, a fact acknowledged by the "External links" section, but it has been at worst paraphrased rather than directly copied, no sentences have been copied word for word, indeed I can't see any key phrases that have been copied either. What's your basis for this being a violation? MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 17:04, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Above text was deleted by User:Petaholmes (4 October 2005) after deleting the article. I have restored this, as without any response, this discussion can hardly be considered over. I believe the article should be undeleted. MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 11:23, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]