Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard" on Wikipedia
- This was the community sanction noticeboard. This forum was previously used for the discussion of community bans, prior to consensus at Wikipedia:Miscellany...838 bytes (77 words) - 19:45, 3 June 2022
- area. Such a sanction may be imposed by the Arbitration Committee or by the Wikipedia community through a discussion at a central noticeboard such as...4 KB (550 words) - 09:23, 26 October 2010
- community sanction. Community sanctions are proposed and discussed on the admin noticeboard, and logged here for convenience since said noticeboard has...3 KB (424 words) - 15:52, 4 November 2007
- also called "personal sanctions", which apply only to individual editors. General sanctions are measures used by the community or the Arbitration Committee...85 KB (1,024 words) - 20:13, 20 July 2024
- several WP:ANI incidents and this Community sanction discussion, will lead - good editor or not - to a community ban, as the decision to invite him to...53 KB (8,040 words) - 21:06, 28 February 2023
- (UTC) Because it is unrelated to "community sanctions" and therefore does not belong on the "community sanction noticeboard". For additional eyes, I'd suggest...288 KB (38,726 words) - 17:31, 20 March 2023
- Moved to Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard/Unblocking of Daniel Brandt. 02:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC) No consensus for community action. Editors are...268 KB (34,705 words) - 17:59, 20 March 2023
- times by different administrators, nearly community banned as described on Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard/Archive8#PalestineRemembered_again, and...253 KB (34,481 words) - 08:09, 3 April 2023
- also Jimbo's comment below. Addhoc 16:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Community sanction noticeboard has no jurisdiction here and is not able to accomplish this...253 KB (36,893 words) - 18:00, 20 March 2023
- community bans are still in effect. The decisions made on the community sanction noticeboard have also spread to other pages concerning the community...144 KB (21,001 words) - 11:58, 14 March 2023
- itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Community_sanction_noticeboard&oldid=132759709 Now, the offense speaks for itself: My prosecution...256 KB (37,565 words) - 08:12, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard to request a baseball topic community ban on Tecmo or go to Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard for a binding...246 KB (35,568 words) - 16:27, 30 May 2022
- admins will be able to do? For me, the community role is in approving or rejecting proposed bans and sanctions. Sort of a public hearing for cases that...292 KB (41,425 words) - 21:45, 21 April 2022
- 19 September 2007 (UTC) I guess "Community sanction noticeboard" means that if the Community agrees on a sanction, and it is violated, and evidence is...262 KB (37,884 words) - 16:27, 30 May 2022
- March 2007 (UTC) I would say so, yes. If the community reaches an overwhelming consensus that a sanction should be applied, and the editor refuses to...245 KB (30,978 words) - 14:30, 3 March 2023
- the issue, this is a very inappropriate request. Community bans or indefinite blocks are sanctions of last resort against inveterate troublemakers who...148 KB (21,512 words) - 20:56, 28 January 2023
- of interest noticeboard, I got this suggestion: How about taking this to Wikipedia:Community sanction noticeboard and requesting a community ban? I think...264 KB (39,587 words) - 10:14, 10 March 2023
- to something he know BD believes in is unconscionable and deserving of sanction in itself. --Justanother 19:53, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Endorse, with regret...167 KB (21,612 words) - 10:41, 5 March 2023
- think that Wikipedia is run by the community. Hence I am not sure why this is brought up on the community noticeboard. >Radiant< 17:01, 27 February 2007...245 KB (36,927 words) - 20:56, 28 January 2023
- there with a note indicating that the discussion has moved. The community sanction noticeboard has been criticized for being a low-activity page that is frequented...3 KB (488 words) - 10:32, 8 December 2007
- editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards and policies" at Wikiquote? There is no evidence
- edits with another; distort consensus; stir up controversy; or circumvent sanctions or policy. These same principles apply to editors who decide to cease