Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 17

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

October 17

Category:Uniclinic Atlético Clube players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. This CFD should have been closed speedily; it is strange that it has been left open for so long. The old category will be redirected per WP:Category redirects that should be kept. – Fayenatic London 17:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Club changed name, matching article name format. BRDude70 (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Rich Farmbrough's Dictionary of National Biography contributor templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. I have listed the contents at User:Rich Farmbrough/DNB/Contributor templates, along with the 2011 text from the category page which stated that the templates are a temporary phenomenon to be deleted once the import is complete. – Fayenatic London 17:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No need to categorise userpages. WOSlinker (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Templates for general use

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete as WP:SOFTDELETE, i.e. this may be reversed if someone finds that it is useful after all. – Fayenatic London 16:31, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Category is added by the use of Template:Template rating. Once a template is ready for general use, there shouldn't be any need to categorise it in this way. WOSlinker (talk) 18:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Songs written by Mike Leeson

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 October 25#Category:Songs written by Mike Leeson

Category:Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete.Fayenatic London 23:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category contains essentially dozens of redirects, for example Falcon 9 flight 33, which all point to the same page: List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches. Looks useless. Falcon rocket launches are already well-categorized under Category:Spacecraft launched by Falcon rockets which includes Category:SpaceX commercial payloads, Category:SpaceX military payloads and Category:SpaceX payloads contracted by NASA. — JFG talk 14:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:FlightTime's custom templates & sub-categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete WOSlinker (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: No need to categorise userpages. WOSlinker (talk) 09:18, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@WOSlinker: Just go ahead and delete the pages, I cannot think of any rational that would save them. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ethnic enclaves in Australia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. For the record, it currently contains Category:Chinatowns in Australia, Category:Little Italys in Australia, Greek Precinct, Melbourne, Malay Kampong Group and Thai Town, Sydney. – Fayenatic London 08:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Not sure which policy is most relevant but these aren't ethnic enclaves in Australia. Australia doesn't really have ethnic enclaves, it has areas with higher proportions of migrants of various ethnicities, precincts of cultural establishments, majority-Malay external territories, and Aboriginal Australian communities which aren't described as ethnic enclaves. This category is not fit-for-purpose. Onetwothreeip (talk) 04:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Multi-level marketing companies based in Utah

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep but remove table (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is really a subject for speedy deletion but is there anyone out there who wants to explain how this is not how categories are created? It is a list. OK, best just to look at it. Doprendek (talk) 01:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Last I saw that category page, it was not a list. It was a category with article entries, and was a child category of two other relevant parent categories. I do know that Utah is known for having an unusually high concentration of local MLM companies. I can't comment on whether or not this category should be deleted on its merits as a category, but the list is not the category but appears to be a later addition. - Gilgamesh (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.