Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 January 18

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

January 18

Category:Songs from animated films

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: rename and purge, this is follow-up on a similar earlier discussion regarding the parent category. "Written for a film" is a defining characteristic of a song, but it was an existing song just used in a later film then the film is not defining for the song. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Donlago, Dimadick, Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, Carlossuarez46, and Fayenatic london: pinging participants and closer of earlier discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:WikiProject Women music

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Empty; meant to be Category:WikiProject Women in Music? --Another Believer (Talk) 19:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Spectra Animation

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Eponymous category for a television production company, without the volume of spinoff content needed to warrant one. There are just three shows filed here, and the company doesn't even have an article about the company at all -- so this is just a WP:SMALLCAT, because there just aren't enough articles here to justify a dedicated category. Bearcat (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Members of the Polish Sejm

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:44, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename for consistency within Category:Members of the Sejm by term. Somehow these three periods were omitted from Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_July_16#Members_of_the_Sejm_YYYY-YY, which settled on "Members of the Polish Sejm" without being more specific about precisely which republic it was at the time. Since that CFD, the date format has been expanded from 2-year to 4-year dates. – Fayenatic London 14:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Abrahamic religions and LGBT topics

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: merge, this will make it easier for readers to find the Christian, Islamic and Judaic category next to the Buddhist and Hindu siblings. While "Abrahamic religions" is not wrong, it is quite a specialist term, not recognizable for too many people. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Middle-earth words

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:58, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: There's only one article in this category, and it is about a poem of that name, not the word itself. There's no good category to upmerge to. Furthermore, most of the redirects seem to be used in the context of names of things, not in the sense of the actual words themselves having an linguistic importance. Hog Farm (talk) 05:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.