Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 10

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
< December 9 December 11 >

December 10

Category:Catholic nuns

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 December 18#Category:Catholic nuns

Category:X (Nintendo franchise)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 07:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, category is not necessary. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 21:49, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Greyhawk nations

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 07:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: A category for nations in Greyhawk, a D&D campaign setting. The only remaining pages in this category are redirects. I just doubt there are any notable nations in Greyhawk! Josh Milburn (talk) 20:01, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Edible cephalopods

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 07:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Being edible is subjective (e.g. see an earlier CFD re fish) and often non-defining (many of the articles such as Bathypolypus valdiviae make no mention of edibility).  Note: check that Octopus as food and Squid as food are still sufficiently categorized. For info: There is a partial list. DexDor (talk) 18:19, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete most cephalopods are edible in the sense of not being poisonous (a couple species are known to secrete a poisonous slime, although it isn't clear whether this renders the flesh inedible). Some cephalopods may be unpalatable (although it might be possible to process the flesh to remove the unpalatable compounds). Most cephalopods aren't regularly eaten by humans because they may be too small, occur in small numbers, or inhabit inaccessible places (deep-sea) to be worth harvesting commercially. A category for cephalopods commercially harvested for human food might be appropriate. A category for edibility is not.
Edible is a continuum running from tasty to bland, to palatable with processing, to unpalatable (can't be fixed by processing), to non-toxic with processing to toxic (can't be fixed by processing). Toxicity may also vary based on a diet that may sometimes include other organisms toxic to humans, or by body part (I'm not sure if diet/body part toxicity is actually the case for any cephalopods, but these cases of toxicity are not infrequent with other animals). Plantdrew (talk) 20:14, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Category:HAGGE®??

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: deleted by User:Yunshui as WP:G3. Tknifton (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: nonsense category. Tknifton (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games based on Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge, also to Category:Cartoon Network video games. MER-C 19:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT, an entire separate category is not necessary for this. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Compostela Valley

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: procedural close, relisted with sub cats at WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 17:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: The province was renamed after a plebiscite conducted on 7 December 2019. hueman1 (talk) 09:15, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Qualifies for speedy rename. This doesn't need discussion, see WP:CFDS. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@P199: Can you help me with this? hueman1 (talk) 14:21, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @HueMan1: only admins can do this. I have added {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}} to the entire category tree. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Taxa named after David Attenborough

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. MER-C 07:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per previous discussions such as this. DexDor (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_10&oldid=931412265"