Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Wikipedia:BADSITES" on Wikipedia
- Wikipedia:Attack sites (redirect from BADSITES)of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. Shortcuts WP:BADSITES WP:BADSITE WP:BAS...4 KB (497 words) - 15:21, 14 October 2022
- without the intent of improving Wikipedia. I came to view the proposed WP:BADSITES as an extension of our policy on No Personal Attacks, as several others...8 KB (961 words) - 00:34, 6 January 2024
- the discussion was Delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2012 (UTC) BADSITES → Wikipedia (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ] ...21 KB (1,891 words) - 08:29, 21 February 2022
- personal attack on one of our editors[[deprecated source?] Delete per WP:BADSITES Conspiracy Smasher (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Well-sourced and...4 KB (388 words) - 14:30, 7 February 2022
- violation of BADSITES and should have been summarily dismissed. 76.109.38.129 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2015 (UTC) You forgot to log in. WP:BADSITES is a failed...11 KB (2,166 words) - 02:14, 6 January 2024
- and continue "working quietly here without starting vast drama-filled BADSITES AN threads in which you then go make yourself look awful." Anthonyhcole...9 KB (1,493 words) - 01:45, 6 January 2024
- filter log · block user · block log) After the initial (failed) proposal of WP:BADSITES as policy, a successful attempt was made to add language to Wikipedia:No...25 KB (3,755 words) - 21:05, 10 February 2023
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Attack sites/Evidence (section The application of "NPA/BADSITES/MONGOCASE" to good-faith encyclopedic content has resulted in unnecessary, disruptive edit warring.)that ruling is the language that always gets dredged up about badsites. There are no badsites. Even the specific finding about Encyclopedia Dramatica shows...107 KB (12,403 words) - 21:05, 10 February 2023
- The website in question fails two wikipedia policies, WP:ATTACK, and WP:BADSITES (Even though it was rejected). The site risks the real life identities...6 KB (754 words) - 12:52, 24 August 2023
- it you potentially run into the (misguided) WP:BADSITES, which is why i dislike the proposed BADSITES wording. In any case, as it stands now, the page...11 KB (1,509 words) - 08:40, 22 March 2022
- target subject is a "BADSITE"). --Allen3 talk 12:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Delete. The connection here is surely the failed WP:BADSITES policy, which in...17 KB (1,676 words) - 12:01, 10 February 2023
- case of WR, the problem arose during the initial BADSITES discussion that the proponents of BADSITES would attack WR by making unsubstantiated claims...456 KB (69,535 words) - 20:39, 22 May 2022
- history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:BADSITES/Wikipedia talk:No personal attacks. That site actively defames and outs...14 KB (1,875 words) - 04:56, 3 April 2023
- November 2007 (UTC) Consensus Can Change, but while the current situation re:BADSITES, is the consensus of Wikipedia, MONGO should reasonably be expected to...57 KB (6,394 words) - 09:46, 3 April 2023
- MONGO's rather extreme views on the BADSITES issue. (For the record, (a) I do not support the rejected WP:BADSITES proposal, and (b) I don't object to...150 KB (20,228 words) - 18:10, 14 March 2023
- WP:BADSITES. The argument for removal in those situations is often that posters on the site have engaged in the behavior outlined at WP:BADSITES, such...9 KB (2,956 words) - 02:41, 6 January 2024
- This seems to be "Son of BADSITES: BADPODCASTS!" *Dan T.* (talk) 15:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Is screaming "BADSITES! BADSITES! WAH! WAH! WAH!" the only...36 KB (4,626 words) - 17:18, 22 December 2023
- Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 8 (section BADSITES / NPA in articles (September 2007))12 September 2007 (UTC) I supported the BADSITES policy proposal only because my definition of what a BADSITE is is one that routinely engages in the...179 KB (27,900 words) - 11:05, 18 May 2022
- as relevant reason to support as BADSITES is a reason to Oppose. Nick 21:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC) Support - The BADSITES proposal does not appear to have...202 KB (28,027 words) - 08:11, 3 April 2023
- reverting harassment link deletions. Misinterpreting BADSITES Arbcom or misinterpreting rejected BADSITES policy or WP:NPA will not save them so it's a service...296 KB (43,130 words) - 10:35, 21 March 2023