Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zumic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zumic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable third-party sources on or about this topic to establish its notability; this page is dependent almost entirely on references to Zumic's website, which I'm sure is a reliable source in and of itself to use but not deserving of its own article. Dan56 (talk) 16:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete. per nomination, + a search turns up nothing better for establishing notability.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:01, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:28, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:47, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — Music1201 ^talk 17:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:37, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:15, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.