Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zum zum zum

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Although a merge might be appropriate, there is no consensus as to where a merge should happen (Mazda#Marketing v. Only the Strong). Should be discussed. Also, the article should be renamed per Dhartung to the proper title of the song, as originally recorded, with "Zum zum zum" being a redirect to that, per MOS. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:19, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zum zum zum

Zum zum zum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable song. Visor (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or merge to Only the Strong. Stifle (talk) 19:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:MUSIC.--RyRy5 (talk) 19:09, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Visor (talk) 19:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep Although I agree this does fail WP:MUSIC, the fact that this song has been sampled in Mazda commercials leads me to believe that some type of mention is appropriate either in Mazda or Only the Strong. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:11, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep per above and per ghits showing the phrase has some currency, e.g. [1]. JJL (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Although using a search engine like Google can be useful in determining how common or well-known a particular topic is, a large number of hits on a search engine is no guarantee that the subject is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia." Please read WP:GHITS. Visor (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment I have. It says in part: "...using a search engine like Google can be useful in determining how common or well-known a particular topic is..." which was my goal here. That formed a part of my reasoning, as did the nature of the pages I saw (one of which I cited) and the reasoning of Mr Senseless to which I referred (prominent use in both a movie and a commercial). JJL (talk) 19:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep but move to Capoeira mata um ("capoeira kills one"), the actual name of this traditional/folkloric song, for which there are Google Books sources among others. --Dhartung | Talk 21:07, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Only The Strong due to little notability on it's own.  Atyndall93 | talk  11:44, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Mazda#Marketing as all the important information is already there. A reading of the Only the Strong talk page convinces me that it is unlikely that it would be an appropriate merge target (and it seems highly likely that any material that would be merged there would be quickly deleted). B.Wind (talk) 03:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zum_zum_zum&oldid=1140135727"