Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoltán Arany

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 07:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zoltán Arany

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. WP:BEFORE doesn't bring up much. Perhaps somebody could step in have a look. scope_creep^Talk 18:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think he's relevant. This track on Youtube has alone over 2 Million clicks. His own channel has over 19 Million video views ( Social Blade link), for medieval music, that's enormous. Therefore he is quite famous in the medieval music scene. --A11w1ss3nd (talk) 21:51, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For social media it is subscribers that important and he has 30k, or just under. 30k is not a lot. The figure somebody needs to reach to be stand-alone notable is 250k subscribers. Nationalistic songs tend to get played much more by definition, and on top that there is not much else. scope_creep^Talk 23:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is not enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:57, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.