Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zofia Sapieha

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see any reason to delay our processes on the basis of pl.wiki's; if they do find sources we didn't locate, we can always undelete. ♠PMC(talk) 08:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zofia Sapieha

Zofia Sapieha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I see no indication of notability in the form of significant coverage in reliable sources, as required by WP:BASIC notability criteria. The subject appears to have lived a private life of no interest to the media or historians. The article is a mere genealogical entry, yet Wikipedia is not a genealogy website but an encyclopedia. Surtsicna (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.