Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zinox Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Euryalus (talk) 11:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zinox Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no visible notibility Mandavi (talk) 15:14, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 02:28, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: A few press releases can be seen regarding this firm's activities, most recently in hybrid solar energy and the $25m European Technology Trust Fund loan. The firm is described as "arguably Africa’s most integrated ICT conglomerate" here, in the context of an interview with the founder. There is enough to confirm this as a firm going about its business and possibly important in its local market but I think WP:CORPDEPTH requires more specific and non-primary coverage. AllyD (talk) 07:10, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A notable and hugely popular African technological firm. Darreg (talk) 13:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable company ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Cool - it its such a notable company, please provide sources that establish notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG. "News" articles appear to consist of run-of-the-mill company-generated articles. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:24, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- unsourced corporate spam; nothing to salvage here. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.