Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zid (1976 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:20, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zid (1976 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Rajeshbieee/Gantlet related article, with similar issues with sourcing that had been dePRODed. A search for sourcing using the India WP's search engine doesn't bring up much of anything. The same issues as the other AfDs applies here. G5 doesn't apply to this article.

A note to anyone searching: there are multiple films by this name and as far as I can tell, they seem to be unrelated to this movie. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:33, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Same case with about 5 others. The only source here is eBay, which is obviously not reliable. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I appreciate that many (most?) of the movies in this bunch may turn out to have no apparent online sourcing at all, but this one has some online presence, albeit in barely visible snippets. A GBooks search for <Zid Nutan> produces glimpses of reviews such as [1] [2]. Unless someone knows how to magically expand the snippets, it's probably not enough to sustain an article, but I can see why the deprodder might have thought it was worthy of attention. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thanks to Arxiloxos, I could add the two print references in the reference section.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 20:25, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Esquivalience ^t 02:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 02:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources added. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - barely passes notability criteria with the added references. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.