Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhu Fulin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:16, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zhu Fulin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only notability comes out of the corruption charges. Case of WP:BIO1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and China. Shellwood (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The sources in the article are enough for GNG. There are more sources at the end of the Baidu Baike article Mucube (talk • contribs) 02:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Has Reuters and the biggest news sites in China as sources, so there's GNG.KatoKungLee (talk) 20:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Sourcing meets WP:GNG. BLP1E requires that the subject plays a small role in the individual event, which isn't the case here (see also WP:NOT1E). WJ94 (talk) 13:58, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.