Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zephyr (Tornado Outbreak)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zephyr (Tornado Outbreak)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about character from video game, no indication of notability outside of the game itself, and appears to be entirely WP:Original research. OnionRing (talk) 13:38, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following page on another character from the game, for the same reasons as above:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 03:31, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - both Nimbus (Tornado Outbreak) and Zephyr (Tornado Outbreak). These are game character articles of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in independent references. The game is notable (see Tornado Outbreak) and there are incidental references to the character in articles on the game including http://www.ign.com/articles/2009/10/05/tornado-outbreak-review, but this is not enough to establish stand-alone notability of a character. The only ref provided for either article is a one-sentence description of the character from ign - still too brief.Dialectric (talk) 04:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: With the complete lack of coverage in our list of reliable sources, the character is not notable and the article fails WP:GNG. AdrianGamer (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.