Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zehri

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zehri

Zehri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability or that this tribe really exists. Unsourced. JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: No evidence (or even claim) of notability. I can't even find any information from a google search. bojo | talk 22:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Cannot find any source which even mentions the existence of this tribe. Onel5969 TT me 00:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Although not a RS, Sanaullah Zehri does talk about this family/tribe. I really don't doubt that it exists, however still nothing to establish notability. MB 05:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, pending evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – Per source searches, it existed in the 1950s, but unsure if it still exists. Below are some sources. Not finding significant coverage to meet WP:N, though. North America1000 20:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.