Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zedar
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirected to main article. Anyone can merge the content from the history to the main article should they please, as the content behind the redirect wasn't deleted. Daniel (talk) 03:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Zedar
- Zedar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Recreation of previously prodded article about a fictional character.[1] A Google search finds mentions of this character on several Wikipedia pages along with a couple of Fan fiction sites, but nothing that appears to qualify as a reliable source. Article also suffers from a secondary problem of being written almost entirely WP:INUNIVERSE and will require a complete rewrite to conform with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Delete as per WP:V unless sufficient independent sources to allow for a WP:NPOV article are provided. --Allen3 talk 19:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is too in-universe to appear salvagable. I should think anyone wishing to create an encyclopedic article on this topic (provided notability could be established) would want to start over from scratch. -Verdatum (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Doubtful whether this is important enough for a separate article--merge either to list of characters, or to main article. For characters spanning multiple vols. in a series, organising material around them can be the most helpful form of presentation to those who do not know the series intimately as fans. This is the opposite of fancruft. DGG (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.