Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zdzisław Celiński

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Notability established after recent additions. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zdzisław Celiński

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find definitive proof of any notability of this man. Most of the google results are for a professor of engineering, but that's a different guy who passed in 2023. The lack of a Polish wikipedia article, while not a deal breaker, is a bit suspicious. The handful of books appear to be the other guy as well. The only source I found was [1] but it appears to have mostly been pulled from here and they outright say there that there's almost no information about him. Wizardman 22:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Poland. Wizardman 22:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I found some additional sources, all in Polish: https://bcpw.bg.pw.edu.pl/Content/5595/PDF/02ik39_nr2.pdf, https://genealogia.okiem.pl/powstaniec-styczniowy/71126/zdzislaw-celinski, https://przegladpolskopolonijny.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/przeglad-polsko-polonijny-nr-5-6.pdf. But they don't really support his notability, so I vote for deletion. Bendegúz Ács (talk) 00:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. First hit in Google books has a paragraph long coverage of him [2], with a footnote to a popular history magazine. Since it is from 2006 and cites a 1931 article in said magazine, no citigenesis here. He is mentioned in several other sources as well [3]. Seems like a WP:TROUT for the nom for failure to do a basic Google Book search. PS. The '39 source found by Bedeguz above also seems fine (reliable), although I see only a brief mention on the subject there. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how I'm unable to view the book (says I'm at a limit somehow) the trout seems mighty unnecessary. Wizardman 02:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I added some info, person seems notable. Marcelus (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.