Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zack Martin (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zack Martin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable character, fails WP:GNG. I see there was a AfD already which closed as "keep". But that AfD had pathetic votes, with people trying to inherit notable from the show and actor and people claiming that sources exist that just aren't here. We dont keep things just because sources MAY exist, we keep things because sources DO EXIST. Beerest 2 talk 22:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I find it pretty hard to believe that sources exist. Most sites have really old archives, and the character isn't really THAT old. Notability can't just simply be taken from the show. A merge is also appropriate, but I don't really know to where. In any case, this character fails WP:GNG. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.