Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaask

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rlendog (talk) 15:08, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zaask

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Queried speedy delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see the reason for this article to be removed. It has references to sources from very popular media in Portugal. Kirube (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One of the references, a very popular news journal, has been read by over 6000 viewers and liked by around 1000. The article is in par with many other silicon valley companies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.136.38.18 (talk) 06:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Relying on the Google translations, there clearly are major news articles about the subject. DGG ( talk ) 01:11, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do see public workshops being conducted by Zaask with great interest from public. Being from PT, I do see a great interest in this. Moreover there are around 15 people rating the article as a trustworthy one.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.76.39.177 (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would propose that you visit news.google.pt and type in Zaask. The articles that appear there are worthy enough for this to stay. Moreover, there are conventional media (hardcopy newspapers and TV) covering this as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.76.39.177 (talk) 12:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - A notable topic regarding Internet culture that appears just from the Portuguese sources in the article to have received significant coverage. There are likely more sources available. Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.