Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ZHUB.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ZHUB.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website/web service. All available sources to be found consist entirely of self-published sources (the company's own website or press releases they have published.) Given the language in the article, I'd almost say it could be deleted as WP:SPAM, but that could be fixed if any reliable sources could be found. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:03, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, promotional, no independent sources. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Clarkcj12 (talk) 19:12, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Classic spam, replete with rampant overlinking. bd2412 T 21:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources and the article itself is spam. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.