Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yunqi Partners

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yunqi Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:NCOMPANY. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only press releases and passing mentions in financial news, per WP:CORPDEPTH. Declined four times at draft without improvements, suggesting that draftifying again won't help. Captain Calm (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Striking the proposal part of an AfD proposal means... what? (Just curious.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Captain Calm (talk) 16:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is not enough material to show notability , and nothing at all which would meet the standards of WP:NCORP. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable, despite the valiant refbombing effort. Also possible COI issues. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Run of the mill company that doesn't have anything notable about it. Despite the clear ref bombing attempt by someone that is likely a COI editor. Nothing about this passes WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and DGG. References are terrible. Bearian (talk) 20:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Non-notable Chinese spam, published by a SPA in in one edit. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 07:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.