Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yumnam
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 09:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
- Yumnam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails the general notability guideline. Source searches and news searches reveal no independent, reliable coverage of either the group or the term. DrStrauss talk 13:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 13:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Whilst the article requires some copy-editing, I don't see notability as an issue. The name is clearly common, and as is often the case in the region it appears to denote a community in itself. See for example https://books.google.com/books?id=wLzDLsEYZGQC&pg=PA36 , https://books.google.com/books?id=Qs4BAAAAMAAJ [p. 76] etc.. --Soman (talk) 10:23, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Those are just passing mentions. Your argument boils down to passing mentions and it exists. That doesn't satisfy GNG. DrStrauss talk 15:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I cleaned up the stub. Without any references or specific people of this name, I'm not sure how the article can be kept. But they possibly do exist. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:05, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 13:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 13:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, this article has no references as it sits. This information would be better served on the Meitei people page. Randomeditor1000 (talk) 14:29, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, This article has no references, or any information. If there is information on this, I feel like it would be just as likely to be brought forward from nothing as this stub. With Thanks - Lee Vilenski(talk) 15:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.