Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Young Global Leaders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Young Global Leaders

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. While plenty of "sources" exist, they are almost uniformly non-independent, PR, insignificant, or promotional in nature. This topic does not have sufficient significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards and Politics. —Ganesha811 (talk) 23:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are enough independent sources. Like: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] This topic meets GNG.🤾‍♂️ Malo95 (talk) 08:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, keep, I guess--but I did some major pruning. The sourcing is not so strong that it warrants the kind of content it had. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

People NEED to know who is a part of the WEF, and I very much suspect that's exactly why it's going to be deleted. 2A00:23C6:F494:8501:30ED:F594:DFA4:58FC (talk) 14:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you NEED to keep track of Young Global Leaders for conspiratorial purposes, the WEF itself has a full database, which I'm sure has been archived in many places. The question on Wikipedia is whether the content is notable enough to be encyclopedic. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep the Subject seems important to an extent. I have analyzed the article, and saw that it is notable enough. And, can be kept.Ploreky^{Have a problem?} 17:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Malo95 and Drmies. There appears to be just enough significant coverage in reliable independent sources to cross the notability threshold. Sal2100 (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.