Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ye Hai Mohabbatein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sourced added, Nominator blocked, (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ye Hai Mohabbatein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

does not meet notability guideline and very few sources A.A.Wasif | Talk 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep the current version has multiple pieces of coverage from the largest newspaper in the country and has documented several major award wins. easily meets WP:GNG-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 11:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 April 3. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:43, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:35, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep — Source is not always necessary for claim notability, (for e.g. cricketers, footballers articles). The show has won too many awards, and it's enough for claim notability, there is no sense for deletion. Ch an der 18:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.