Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarana

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 17:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yarana

Yarana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, no independent significant coverage by reliable sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 11:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
language:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:INDAFD: Yarana Arbaaz Khan Shahid Khan Shafqat Cheema Shah Jahan Adnan Shah
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I've actually been seeing these recently and the user has started a considerable amount of them and yet listing no sources or otherwise better information....Delete for now. SwisterTwister talk 02:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.