Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yara Amaral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 06:58, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yara Amaral

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is an unsourced stub, not evidence of notability. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC) Delete as proposer. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-The Portuguese wiki shows that she has quite a bit of notability actually. (Granted I don't know that language but looking over it....) Wgolf (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Yes her Portuguese wikipage suggests a regular working actress. Sources include this one, plus here (a photo shows her featured on a magazine cover), there was a biography written about her, she died tragically. Another source here, also here. One day her page got almost 2000 pageviews, a sign of interest even though of course pageview tallies are not an official measure. I think she mostly worked in Brazil (not Portugal), dying in Rio de Janeiro. Another unofficial test (I use it, usually correlates with notability): image consistency; like if we put her name in quotes, then search for "images", such as here, the same person comes up in lots of images (not different people).--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.