Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y-Mag (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:57, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Y-Mag

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, minimal sourcing. First AFD was from 2008, second was from September and closed as "no consensus" due to lack of participation. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 08:55, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 09:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article needs updating, but there were numerous sources provided in the first deletion nomination (many unfortunately now suffering from linkrot), and seems a notable magazine of its time. Greenman (talk) 10:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as substantially covered in reliable independent sources which notes its significance. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.