Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xplace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xplace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP, WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Mediran ^{talk|contribs} 11:10, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ21™ 03:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theo polisme 02:19, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This company doesn't meet the notability guidelines. The article is also rather promotional in tone. Rotten regard (talk) 03:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wholly promotional piece for company that fails WP:CORP. The sources given are self-generated or regurgitated news releases. §FreeRangeFrog 00:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing verifiable as now stands. Refs of statements are either from the subject of article (therefore wholly unreliable or Origional Research); or are in Hebrew (unreadable to most). GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 22:42, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.