Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XpLo5ioN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

XpLo5ioN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines for musicians. I have been unable to locate significant coverage from reliable sources. It appears that the original PROD template was removed without addressing the concern. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – TheGridExe (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This group has done a nice job getting their mixes and videos listed at dozens of streaming sites and promotional social media, some of which are used as "evidence" in the article already. I cannot find anything beyond these and other basic listings of their existence, but existence is not notable. A few sources talk more concretely about the original songs that these guys remixed, but notability is notability is not inherited either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:59, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, for failing WP:MUSICBIO. Ifnord (talk) 18:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.