Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavier Diaz-Latorre

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier Diaz-Latorre

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 18:30, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looking. First thing I found is this bio from a notable institute where he seems to be teaching. Looks like our article has the same text, a typical beginner's mistake. Second I found is this short bio from a notable music series where he seems to have performed. Third thing I found is recordings. Fourth thing I found is he has been teaching masterclasses. Fifth thing I found is a review. I have no more time right now but he seems notable enough, - it's just soft instruments that he plays. The article should be trimmed and rephrased, and sourced better. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:12, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The sources given by Gerda Arendt are enough even if the article is no good. Another review here: https://www.classicmelbourne.com.au/jordi-savall-with-xavier-diaz-latorre/. Sheijiashaojun (talk) 01:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in view of the multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion that show significant coverage to enable a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.