Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Warcraft Classes: Warlock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 06:24, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

World of Warcraft Classes: Warlock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some time ago, the community went through a painful process of removing many of these WoW fan articles. There are many, many, MANY sites, 2 of which are the only non-publisher sources for the article that are appropriate for providing how-to and class-detail about this very popular game. The PROD was removed without comment. User talk:Unfriend12 20:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable fancruft. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As submitter.User talk:Unfriend12 04:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nuke it from orbit for lack of WP:RS and hence a current failure of WP:Notability. --Izno (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NOTGUIDE and VERIFY. Mephistophelian (contact) 01:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as a pretty clear violation of WP:GAMEGUIDE. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 13:15, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:JUNK. The topic might be notable, but an article on the class would need to be written from the ground up. --Odie5533 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.