Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Against Violence and Extremism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

World Against Violence and Extremism

World Against Violence and Extremism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SUSTAINED coverage. Two-day in event in 2014 with coverage largely limited to that period. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Iran. Iskandar323 (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdrawn by nominator - ok, let's not waste any more time on this. While the original event seems to have been a non-event, there seems to be significant meta discussion around the actors and the purpose of the initative. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I disagree with the nominator that coverage was limited to 2014. You need only search for the event name in google news, and then adjust the date range to 2015-2022 to see plenty coverage since 2014. Some examples:

1. https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/300620/Rouhani-urges-OIC-to-iron-out-divisions-through-dialogue
2. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/11/opinion/mohammad-javad-zarif-saudi-arabias-reckless-extremism.html CT55555 (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   I don't think that a handful of trivial mentions from 2016 (all of which only make a cursory mention of the 2013 proposal/2014 event) really overturns the absence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage. It is an Iranian political talking point that the regime uses to promote its goodwill and which, yes, occasionally crops up as a trivial mention, but nothing more. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I don't believe that WP:SUSTAINED applies here. Discussed in books published in 2018, 2020 and 2021. Pahlevun (talk) 17:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - This McGill international Review discussion of W.A.V.E. appears to be SIGCOV of the event, as does the coverage in this book. Since this coverage extends over years it is clearly a pass for WP:LASTING. FOARP (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.