Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Works Well with Others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Vacation9 (talk) 00:34, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Works Well with Others (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources. Fails WP:NMUSIC. Contested PROD.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep see CBC [1], Fast Forward Weekly [2], Vue Weekly [3], The Georgia Straight [4], ChartAttack [5], Metro Canada [6] 86.44.24.94 (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per the amazing information shown by the IP 86.44.24.94, which indeed prove not only how this article meets GNG but also NMUSIC. I will tag it for improvement. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:32, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  This may also be useful: [7] [8] [9] [10] — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:42, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  {{sofixit}}   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  I'd like to, but I am not interested in music articles by now xD I may bring it to WP:AFI so that other users may do the job after this AFD is closed :) — ΛΧΣ21™ 19:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.