Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woody Long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. -- Longhair\^talk 01:56, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woody Long (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

No assertion or evidence that this actor is notable per WP:PORNBIO. This article was recreated after a deletion. • Gene93k 19:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable. I couldn't find any reliable sources through a Google search (and in fact, the first page of results came back with a link to floor mats made of long, woody fibers...) --Darkwind (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 04:17, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 01:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • delete- clear hoax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it's a hoax, but you've gotta love the name. I can almost hear Beavis & Butt-Head laughing. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for failing WP:PORNBIO, though he's not a hoax - he's featured by IAFD. Huon 15:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is hilarious, since the references in the article are easy enough to verify, yet about half the comments jump to the conclusion that there's a hoax. Shows how uninformed this process is, don't it? VivianDarkbloom 22:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Smite, but you've got to love inventive porn names. DEVS EX MACINA _pray 05:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil 13:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence of notability present. Tabercil 13:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.