Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodie (rapper) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woodie (rapper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural nom. The original comments are below. shoy (reactions) 22:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC) fuck this norcaca Speedy delete The above article was a speedy delete some time ago, but somehow got re-written into Wikipedia. An "independent" artist" from an independent NN label, NN all the way. Articles is completely notability-less. --Danteferno (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's a substantial Allmusic bio and a couple of reviews ([1], [2]), he released 6 albums, at least one on Koch Records, plus there's an article about him from the Ledger Dispatch ([3]).--Michig (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Significantly fails Artist and General Notability guidelines. Unreferenced (and suprising) claims make this seem like a fanpage more than a NPOV article about the artist. Hasteur (talk) 19:42, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.