Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wooden ramps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wooden ramps

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Mccapra (talk) 08:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus 10:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Pontificalibus 10:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Contrary to the nomination, I am fairly certain that Atlantic Wall wooden beach obstacles (an issue in the Normandy landings) are quite notable, e.g. coverage in - [1][2]. The name of the present article is incorrect - this should be Hochpfählen ("high stake"), Hemmbalken, or something similar. There is perhaps merit for a standalone, however we already cover the beach application in Rommel's asparagus#Atlantic Wall defenses. Since this is a poorly sourced fork, with the wrong title, and with contents inferior to Rommel's asparagus#Atlantic Wall defenses - I'm at delete. Had the article been better developed (to merit a spinoff from Rommel's asparagus or had salvageable mergeable material) - I would have !voted otherwise. Since the article title is quite wrong, in my view, there is no need for a redirect. Icewhiz (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The only reference in the article is to an analysis of a movie. @Icewhiz: has provided a better reference in his delete comment. Including "Hochpfählen" in Atlantic Wall might be useful but I don't see a need for a redirect.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Icewhiz. While the Atlantic Walll defences are notable, I don't see anything meriting an article, or even a redirect. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:28, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.