Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wladimir Soto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. StarM 03:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wladimir Soto

Was tagged as speedy, but he appears to have written something that could be notable in the field. Taking it here instead because it is still suspect Mgm|^(talk) 12:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. We need some specialists here. We're dealing with a language barrier - at least, so some folks who can suss out sources and ensure what titles we have is needed. We need some anthropology focused folks to help once we know what is being asserted as this subject's notable work. It seems it has been deleted off one of the sister projects[1]. -- Banjeboi 10:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 02:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete--perhaps there is a language barrier, well, really, there's two. First of all, the article is in barely comprehensible English (even despite Benjiboi's editing efforts), and the difficult claims in the article are not verified or referenced; second, there's the Spanish issue of course. But even in Spanish, the number of sources found on Google are hardly impressive, and really none of them come from what seem to be notable (academic, for instance) websites. So, unless a rescuer comes along who translates this whole thing, and explains it, and references it, and claims real notability, I'm voting delete. Drmies (talk) 01:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not sure of notabilityy. Spanish-language article appears to have been scrapped.--ZayZayEM (talk) 05:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I believe it's a hoax, because there's questionable references and a Google search returned not many results about the actual guy in question, and are just either Facebook, Youtube or jobseeking sites. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 07:52, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I started out to assist in a rescue and came away reasonably certain that notability was lacking. --Stormbay (talk) 04:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.