Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winstars Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winstars Technology

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Every reference fails verification. Website doesn't exist. The creator of the article has also written a draft Draft:Winstars Technology Limited - the same company name, but gives it a totally different description. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article did not pass our notability guideline.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:14, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't imagine why a statement like "Establishment and installation of unified networks" is sourced to a review of a planetarium application, but it is. "commercial IPv6 beta deployment" is sourced to an article that mentions a company called Winstar Display Co., Ltd. that manufactures displays. The sources don't just fail verification; they don't even remotely have anything to do with the subject. Vexations (talk) 11:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a run of the mill company; article lacks reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 15:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.