Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wind Leaves

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis Public Art Collection. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wind Leaves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A metal leaf next to a bench in Indiana. No reason to think this is notable in any way. —Chowbok ☠ 02:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure how they could be notable, and there are no assertions of notability by the article. Monty₈₄₅ 03:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete No claim made for notability. LK (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis Public Art Collection. A work of public sculpture, this could be independently notable if it were a significant work of a significant sculptor or if it received significant independent coverage. I don't find either of these, but even so it is part of the notable IUPUI public art collection, which, incidentally, was "the first group to be documented through the WikiProject, Wikipedia Saves Public Art" (now Wikipedia:WikiProject Public art) and can be mentioned in the article about the collection.--Arxiloxos (talk) 18:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 03:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.