Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimedia project
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Wikimedia Foundation. Redirected content may be accessed through the page history. (non-admin closure) feminist 00:59, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Wikimedia project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This really doesn't seem like a notable topic on its own, especially when articles for the Wikimedia Foundation and all its reader-facing projects exist. Half of the article is about language codes. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as a lower-quality duplicate of content at Wikimedia Foundation and List of Wikipedias. (This article's layout is poorer and sourcing is mainly to technical documents.) Might be redirected to Wikimedia Foundation but I'm not sure if that would be useful. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect/merge Where appropriate. Some of it here, some of it to Meta. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:03, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- redirect/merge: Wikimedia Foundation seems like a good destination GretLomborg (talk) 04:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.