Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimania 2005

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 11:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2005

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Ypnypn (talk) 21:19, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - In addition to WP:POINT, please see WP:BEFORE. Very easily passes our General Nobility Guideline as being part of multiple substantial pieces of independently-published coverage. See, for example, "Wikimania Hits Frantfurt" (Deutsche Welle) and "Wikimania Sweeps Frankfurt" (Der Spiegel). Those two are from the first page of a simple Google search for "WIKIMANIA + FRANKFURT + GERMANY"... Carrite (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Upgrading all the above to Speedy, bad faith nominations, pretty clearly. Carrite (talk) 21:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - does meet WP:GNG. Ansh6 6 6 05:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, coverage in multiple independent third-party sources (albeit primarily in German) demonstrates that the topic passes WP:GNG. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.