Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiWealth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWealth

WikiWealth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously Prodded on grounds "No evidence that this enterprise meets the notability criteria for companies." Prod removed by article creator without comment. Only refs in the article are to press releases and founder's LinkedIn and I haven't located any references in reliable 3rd party sources, so I am bringing it to AfD on same grounds as Prod. AllyD (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Like AllyD, I was unable to find any independent coverage of this website that would show notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - does not appear to meet Wikipedia:Notability (web content). As an aside, I notice that the article doesn't contain a link to the actual WikiWealth web site because wikiwealth.com currently blacklisted on Wikipedia due to rather massive linkspamming in 2009. If the notability problem can be fixed, then whitelisting the "about" page or similar would be needed too. ~Amatulić (talk) 08:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or any other notability standard. Not enough sources--GrapedApe (talk) 03:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.