Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiProfessional

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProfessional (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sustained coverage, nothing much since 2007. Never appears to have taken off. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 14:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. It seems to have gotten a decent amount of reputable coverage back when it was a thing, and vaporware is allowed to have articles. The article will need a lot of work though. --~ฅ(ↀωↀ=)neko-chan^nyan 23:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.