Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiLook
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WikiLook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Yet yet another non-notable Firefox extension. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a catalog. Damiens.rf 18:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I found nothing in a quick search. --Pnm (talk) 00:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I would say that individual Firefox addons aren't notable as a general rule, unless this are special circumstances or significant mainstream-media coverage, which this doesn't seem to have. Herostratus (talk) 13:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.