Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitehot Magazine of Contemporary Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whitehot Magazine of Contemporary Art

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to met WP:NOTABILITY requirements Boleyn (talk) 19:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tagged for lack of notability since 2012. It is safe to assume it will never be able to prove its notability. Fleet Command (talk) 07:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all provided sources are in-house. Pretty slim pickings for an "international" journal, of the recent articles one about Iran ("The Work of Hadi Fallahpisheh") and one about Paris ("Michael Riedel @ Palais de Tokyo"). The magazine appears to be of purely local NYC interest. Google hits are blogs, and reprints of articles by subjects (not neutral, not independent). The NY Times has managed to successfully ignore it for five years, despite articles, or at least mentions, about other new magazines. Volume 1 seems to be the only one that was actually printed. Since then it's been electronic. I didn't find a list of issues or an index. Fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 00:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.