Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Phantom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In addition, the Allmovie review is just an unsubstantiated star-rating. Geschichte (talk) 19:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

White Phantom

White Phantom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 18:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2016-07 ✗ G6

• Delete - Outside of the usual movie databases and sales pages, there does not seem to be any actual coverage of this movie. Even Rotten Tomatoes is showing zero critic reviews. As the director, writer, and production company are all non-notable themselves, there is no place to redirect this to. Rorshacma (talk) 18:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.