Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White House Deputy Press Secretary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to White House Office of the Press Secretary. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White House Deputy Press Secretary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to White House Office of the Press Secretary. The office isn't notable in itself, but as a part of the larger office. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Rathfelder (talk) 14:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect tp White House Office of the Press Secretary per above. -- Dane ^talk 20:00, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is plenty of coverage of this position. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 08:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm sure there is - but is it notable in its own right? Coverage is not the only criterion. Rathfelder (talk) 09:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Coverage is pretty much the only factor in determining notability. By virtue of being a White House Deputy Press Secretary, many individuals receive coverage. I would say that means the position brings coverage, not the individual. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 09:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.