Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whirled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whirled

Whirled (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails the general notability policies. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Internet. UtherSRG (talk) 19:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Per WP:NEXIST. The game got SIGCOV from Kotaku, Engadget, IGN and VentureBeat. It got primary interview from GamesRadar and Engadget. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The refs presented above by ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ suggest the topic meets WP:NVIDEOGAMES, even if the current article fails to ascertain it. Owen× ☎ 15:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. the sources presented by ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ are sufficient to establish notability under the WP:GNG. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.